Skip to main content
This is an example implementation of a content moderation workflow using Humancheck. This demonstrates how to integrate human review for borderline cases, but Humancheck can be adapted to any content review or moderation scenario.

Overview

The content moderation workflow:
  1. AI analyzes content for policy violations
  2. If confidence is low or content is borderline, request human review
  3. Reviewer makes final decision
  4. System applies the decision (approve, reject, flag, etc.)

Implementation

Basic Content Moderation

Advanced Features

Image Moderation

Video Moderation

Batch Moderation

Decision Actions

Approve Content

Reject Content

Modify Content

Routing Rules

Route content moderation to appropriate team:

Dashboard Integration

The content moderation request appears in the dashboard with:
  • Content preview (text, image thumbnail, etc.)
  • Violation type and confidence
  • User information
  • Analysis details
  • Content metadata
Reviewers can:
  • ✅ Approve content for publishing
  • ❌ Reject with reason
  • ✏️ Modify content (redact, edit, etc.) before approving

Best Practices

  1. Set appropriate thresholds: Use different confidence thresholds for different violation types
  2. Provide context: Show why content was flagged
  3. Include content preview: Make it easy for reviewers to see the content
  4. Use urgency levels: High urgency for time-sensitive content
  5. Track patterns: Monitor which types of content need review most often
  6. Feedback loop: Use feedback to improve AI confidence scores

Performance Considerations

  • Non-blocking for non-critical content: Use non-blocking for lower-priority content
  • Batch processing: Group similar content for batch review
  • Caching: Cache analysis results for similar content
  • Async processing: Process moderation requests asynchronously

Next Steps